Eight, only letters, not debate

 Eight, only the letter, can not argue
psychological law is not unreasonable, but more profound, may at first sound sense to me, carefully think it is more reasonable, but only the letter of psychological truth, can not argue, believe you feel more makes sense, do not believe you did not feel that sense. because of faith, are willing to look at the issue in accordance with the anti-logic, the logic is that only the surface of the truth, the truth is the physical properties, anti-logic is the underlying truth, the truth of human nature. do not believe people are always one thinks, is only willing to look at the issue in accordance with the laws of logic, that logic makes sense is the result of a wrong doing, growing in the wrong, more wrong even more so. dog bites man told him more run more bite, and stood to the dog will not bite, he or else faith, they feel no sense, he believed, would feel more justified.
for the experience of before, With a large number of people living experience to feel a deeper anti-logical law, although he did not realize it, doctors point out once, you will suddenly see the light, feeling more sense, for it had never been experienced, people can not accept anti-logical law, told him that he can not believe it. dog bites man is anti-logic, most people can believe, but psychological pain, no one can accept, they will in a tone of disdain Zhibian said: pain? do, believed in doing, it will remove the spot, never get rid of pain, trouble, do not believe to be forever unable to extricate themselves trapped in the pain, medication injections are futile.
physical and psychological, there is logic and anti-logic, two contradictory laws of thinking, which constitutes an insurmountable obstacle to understanding, can only be limited to the field of logic Nei Siwei people to form a difficult psychological barrier to understanding the psychological domain, only to break the logic area, can Nei Siwei in the field of anti-people logic, real smart.
are the main psychological, physical is object, subject and object will be divided into yin and yang circles the world, subject to the nether world, also known as the underworld, the object is positive community, also known as yang. Yang, able to see, touch of the, real, evidence, logical laws of physics, is the forward rule, people feel justified. the subject is grave, invisible, intangible, without words It is illogical, is a psychological law, is rebellious law, people feel any sense. So if the main object of science and scientific debate, the main object of science, but science will never argue. mental patient is in accordance with the laws of physics, logic, look at the anti-psychological logic, logical argument he has the symptoms as evidence, people feel justified, psychology, law is a psychiatrist to see psychological problems, his argument is illogical, there is no evidence, people feel any sense. So psychological patients with the debate psychiatrist, psychologists argue forever, but mental patients. So psychological only letters, not defense, mental patients can be treated the letter, absolutely do not believe the rule is useless.
longer than the debate because the object of science, so to promote debate, that doctrine. the main debate on poor science, the most against the debate, so accept the truth, people would believe, would not argue, so long as do not argue, just want to believe the person who is willing to accept the truth, that is good, is wise, so that . they do not believe, want to debate, to explain unwilling to accept the truth, people unwilling to accept the truth, it is not good, that is unwise, so said: Then you never get the truth, what is the use debate. sketch, The people are unwilling to accept the truth, but curse, people can only say: .
Until now people have a strong belief that only in the object the establishment of scientific field, in the main scientific field does not hold, in the field of physics was established in the field of psychology is not true. because the debate is to argue the logic, logical is the right, anti-logic is wrong, logical to people feel justified, anti-logical people feel any sense. while the principal anti-science and psychology are just logical, with the standard anti-logic to argue with the logic of the standard, is it self-inflicted dull. but not necessarily not the truth of logical , logical is not necessarily the truth, in the main areas of science and psychology, anti-logic is the truth. logic is the field of physics the truth, the truth of logic is the field of psychology, logic is the theorem, Logic is a philosophy, logic is local truth, philosophy is a universal truth, logic is absolute, the philosophy is relative, the logic is still rigid and flexible philosophy of sports, logic is a straight line, there must be an unlimited extension of the end of a dead end eventually, philosophy is a circle, infinite, but also again and again, forever.
in the end is the chicken or the egg? because this is a logical problem, endless must be a dead end, no one can answer this question. But the mention of this issue People will naturally ask, in accordance with the logic is a dead end, that in accordance with the anti-logic, or in accordance with the philosophy of how to answer this question? in accordance with the law is not against logic or the philosophy of the answer to this question, not only should not answer this question, but do not This raised the question. because this is a logical problem, as long as the issue raised is logical thinking, logical thinking to answer this question or has violated the standards of anti-logic and philosophy. If in accordance with the anti-philosophical thinking, logical thinking can make or answer The answer is no sense for the logic of advocates, they would scoff, as a fallacy. anti-logical answer is that chickens can lay eggs, chicken eggs can be. The logical answer is the nonsense that advocates must equal did not say . because the logic is absolute, and requires non is that Africa, or the other. against the logic and philosophy is relative, also is not, He also vital.
but the logic makes sense to, anti-people logic does not feel right, feel the logic makes sense, anti-logical people feel any sense. so that they do not believe the anti-logic, always stand point of logical debate to the anti-logic, anti-logic to do nothing.
Similarly, psychological disorders are treated in accordance with laws of logic psychological problems, though wrong, but it feels right. So psychological patient always love to debate, as long as he felt the psychiatrist does not match with what he said, had the courage to pose with a knowledgeable psychologists argue. obviously he is a layman never come into contact with psychology, and I know they do not understand psychology, but the courage and mastery of psychological defense psychiatrist. If it is physics, an illiterate and physics will not physics teacher argued. even would argue, physics teacher may not be able to argue trouble demanding too illiterate. But as long as the mental patients argued together, let alone a psychiatrist, is versed in psychology, but psychologists also argue uneducated. So psychiatrist not yet argued. psychological awareness of the patient's debate as Doctors no longer eliminated, you can believe it or not, to this end the treatment.
fact, not an absolute defense psychiatrist mental patients, however, only when patients are just absolutely do not believe you did not argue with him, if he You barge to be speechless, he gets angry, says you are stubborn, and even rage, to find Dean sue you. they would rather angry and furious, it will not accept your treatment. The purpose of the treatment of a psychiatrist patients, since treatment is doomed to failure has been, and why again argue forever? So when a doctor to stop arguing, not what to say. This will make mental patient that the doctor had been split down their throats. which psychological Doctors give patients psychological debate, the failure is bound to be a psychiatrist.
but defense wins is the patient's psychological defense failed, the defense lost a therapist, that is his biggest failure. If the psychiatrist is not a debate, but the letter firmly under the guidance of a psychiatrist to do, we can break through psychological barriers and eliminate mental illness, this is his biggest victory. defense lost a therapist, you always stuck in the mental illness problems among pain, can not help, is it his biggest failure. sketch, people argue, to accept other people's advice, then suddenly out of the dog's distress, argue that others can only life lost dogs. psychologists believe that mental patients, in accordance with the guidance of a psychiatrist to do, suddenly you can get rid of disease problems, lost the debate psychiatrist, unable to extricate themselves only to grief life. These self defense that wins the people, not that his biggest failure.
biggest trouble is that psychiatrists can not cure mental illness their families may not be able to handle your family problems. The reason is that psychologists do not believe the family is not only psychological, but an instinctive aversion to psychology, reject, only the debate, there is no letter. Even if a psychiatrist is a well-known psychologist, patients are often thousands of miles away, attracted to home for treatment and their families but did not think he has any genius, if you encounter any problems and disputes, they are willing to the role of family members, to discuss the issue of equality, once they found the words of a psychiatrist with a mental element, they will that you give them the political class, suddenly stopped, and do not want to talk with you, even the role of family members, talking about the power of equality is denied. no matter how effective your explanation, they refused to not listen, your writing no matter how good, they never see, monolithic, poured the water does not enter. If the family has mental illness or mental disorder, had not need to spend money, do not need thousands of miles for treatment, can get good treatment, and family would rather suffer every day, does not make its own psychological expert to treatment. psychological treatment of mental illness doctors handy to someone else, the extraordinary effect, often face their own mental illness and helpless family, psychologists family dispute resolution to others every day, it may not able to handle your family issues. So the family does not want to appear a psychiatrist and, the couple divorced, are quite common. because of mental disease is a mental patient by themselves, psychologists can only teach him the right way to solve Both husband and wife thing, unilateral efforts alone psychiatrist will not be tolerated. and all the family psychiatrist to psychiatrist against, only to psychological doctors were helpless. As a doctor, most troublesome than the disease and their families had not afford treatment, and clearly have the ability to treat a psychiatrist, but not where the family watched their suffering, the anguish is more conceivable.
First Prev Next Last Page
related chain Results: TCM Scientology